On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Shawn Landden <[email protected]> wrote: > I was worried that the fact that we never accept() the socket when using > distribute (now I am convinced we shouldn't use it otherwise)
I'm not sure what you mean here. Distribute-style functionality is absolutely useful with Accept=true (to cap the number of simultaneous connections) as well as Accept=false (to allow running of a process pool of self-accepting, long-running workers). > would cause it to trigger multiple times for only one incoming connection, > if the spawned thread never entered accept() (or we raced it), > but reading this thread makes me think I don't fully understand the > semantics of EPOLLET. There are some decent examples on the man page: http://linux.die.net/man/7/epoll _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
