On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 04:41:27PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> We support exactly two configurations:
> the (conceptually pointless and confusing) legacy split-/user with
> /bin/mount, and the one proper single /usr, where /bin must be a
> symlink to /usr/bin.
BTW, it's not about systemd only. The same is valid for
/sbin/{mount,fsck,mkfs}.<fs> helpers, agetty where we call /bin/login,
etc. etc.
> Nothing else is interesting to support, matters or makes sense in any
> way. In both supported configurations /bin/mount works just fine.
>
> In the very long run, we will get rid of the split-/usr support and at
> that point just hard-code things like /usr/bin/mount; there is no need
> really for a configuration switch here.
Yep.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <k...@redhat.com>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
