On Mon, 20.01.14 17:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 01:14:02PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Sun, 19.01.14 14:51, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) > > wrote: > > > > > So, I prepared a test patch. This all doesn't seem to be too ugly > > > generally, > > > although the warning generation in patch 2 is a bit. > > > > > > Comments? > > > > > > A compatibility libsystemd-login library is created which uses > > > .symver and ifunc magic proposed by Lennart to make programs linked > > > to the old library name continue to work seamlessly. > > > > > > Unfortunately the bfd linker crashes: > > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16467 > > > As a work-around, gold can be used: > > > LDFLAGS=-Wl,-fuse-ld=gold > > > > > > This also doesn't work with LLVM: > > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11897 > > > > Looks good to me. That bfd chokes on this is a bummer though... But as > > long as the bfd fix is backportable it sounds totally OK to me to still > > do this. > The bfs fix is backportable, and was proposed for the stable branch too. > > Anyway, I don't see why using gold would be bad. Good question. I have no experience with gold, but it's commonly available these days, right? maybe we should just default to gold anyway after detection in configur.ac? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
