On Friday 24 January 2014 at 16:15:04, Lennart wrote:
> On Fri, 24.01.14 16:09, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
> > Am 24.01.2014 16:03, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > > It is our job to shutdown all services cleanly. A number of services
> > > needs this, since they need to bring their files into a safe state
> > > before quitting, and mark them as "offline". We cannot just drop that.
> > > 
> > > Note however, that we add have timeouts on all service shutdown
> > > commands, so when some service hangs it will be forcibly aborted with
> > > SIGKILL after 90s.
> > > 
> > > That all said, you can just shutdown with "systemctl poweroff -f"
> > > instead of normal "systemctl poweroff". This will still bring the file
> > > systems in order and things, but wil not bother with shutting down
> > > system services cleanly, but simply SIGTERM and SIGKILL them after a
> > > much shorter timeout.
> > > 
> > > However, something like that can never be the default, we need to give
> > > services the chance to shut down cleanly and in the right order
> > 
> > then bugs like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023820
> 
> I have so far never encountered this issue, but I fear this is a bug
> where somebody who can reproduce this needs to sit down and debug a
> bit...
> 
> Lennart

Any advices on how to do that?
I have both the issue (reproducible on each shutdown) and will to debug.

-- 
Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to