02.02.2014 19:29, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
---
rules/60-persistent-storage.rules | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
b/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
index a4d009a..154ffd9 100644
--- a/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
+++ b/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="module", KERNEL=="block",
ATTR{parameters/events_dfl_
SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="persistent_storage_end"
# skip rules for inappropriate block devices
-KERNEL=="fd*|mtd*|nbd*|gnbd*|btibm*|dm-*|md*", GOTO="persistent_storage_end"
+KERNEL=="fd*|mtd*|nbd*|gnbd*|btibm*|dm-*|md*|zram*",
GOTO="persistent_storage_end"
# ignore partitions that span the entire disk
TEST=="whole_disk", GOTO="persistent_storage_end"
The patch is obviously harmless. However, I am not convinced that it is
needed, because in my setup (without this patch) there are no links in
/dev/disk pointing to any zram device. You can change my opinion by
providing configuration files that do result in such links being created
by systemd.
See
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-February/016614.html
for my configuration files.
<offtopic>
One patch that would be useful, however, is to make systemd say "this
system cannot hibernate" if all swap devices are zrams.
</offtopic>
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
