Am 12.02.2014 21:19, schrieb Lennart Poettering: > On Wed, 12.02.14 20:05, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047614 >> >> Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 >> Component: systemd (Show other bugs) >> Version: 7.0 >> Hardware: Unspecified Unspecified >> Priority urgent Severity high >> >> first reported more than 3 months ago >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023788 >> >> maybe systemd-upstream should consider slow down development >> and spend more energy in quality and stability > > Well, firstly, it's hardly your business how we spend our time
firstly it's my business to say my opinion if i get hit by the result daily and as i woke up that morning i saw a free world which permits that your opinion: i do not care about downstream my optinion: bad attitude in case downstream is the public testbed of your employer with the userbase giving you the needed feedback for work in progress on real world setups the truth is likely somewhere between > Secondly, this bug is fixed upstream and that is what i call "release-and-forget" strategy it has not made it in any Fedora package right now http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=10477 and no http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=491024 does not make things better, it breaks systemd-logind and floods logs - i had installed it a few minutes after build and reverted so finally there is no change downstream over months > Thirdly, patches count more than complaining that may be true, if i not would face the same bug and it's friends in F20 day for day i would not need to complain
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
