On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:35:09AM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 01:34:24PM -0800, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> >> diff --git a/src/network/networkd-network.c
>> >> b/src/network/networkd-network.c
>> >> index 48131c1..a470c22 100644
>> >> --- a/src/network/networkd-network.c
>> >> +++ b/src/network/networkd-network.c
>> >> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ int network_get(Manager *manager, struct udev_device
>> >> *device, Network **ret) {
>> >> network->match_name,
>> >>
>> >> udev_device_get_sysattr_value(device, "address"),
>> >>
>> >> udev_device_get_property_value(device, "ID_PATH"),
>> >> - udev_device_get_driver(device),
>> >> +
>> >> udev_device_get_driver(udev_device_get_parent(device)),
>> >> udev_device_get_devtype(device),
>> >>
>> >> udev_device_get_sysname(device))) {
>> >> log_debug("%s: found matching network '%s'",
>> >> diff --git a/src/udev/net/link-config.c b/src/udev/net/link-config.c
>> > I think this requires some oom hadling, since udev_device_get_parent
>> > allocates memory.
>> > Even though udev_device_get_driver accepts NULL, wouldn't the result be
>> > correct?
>>
>> Hm. How would we distinguish between "no parent" and "oom"? Either way
>> it will just return NULL. What do you have in mind?
>
> You're right, there's no way to distinguish those cases with the current API.
errno should be set, if not it's a bug.
Kay
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
