Hi Jason, On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com> wrote: > - r = sd_rtnl_call(rtnl, message, 0, NULL); > + r = sd_rtnl_call(rtnl, NULL, message, 0);
So this is not 'really' a constructor, so the new convention doesn't apply. The most important thing to me is that we keep sd_rtnl and sd_bus consistent, so I don't think we should change this. Cheers, Tom _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
