On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:45:09AM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > I've now added a paragraph about this change to NEWS. > > > > Not sure what to do in the Fedora package though. > > Why not do the same as in the Arch package? Are there any drawbacks? I > thought that should cover backwards compatibility just fine? Sure, in the common case it'll work fine. But in principle someone could have written 82-my-own-rules.rules file, and now it has lower priority than the new config file.
The rules files - their priority, naming, and semantics - form an interface which must be kept stable (or versioned in a meaningful way) like the programming interfaces and the D-Bus interfaces. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
