On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:25 AM, Leonid Isaev <lis...@umail.iu.edu> wrote: > On Sun, 6 Apr 2014 01:12:45 +0200 > Tom Gundersen <t...@jklm.no> wrote: > >> So in general "masking" .network files (in the sense applied to unit >> files) does not make much sense, and will probably not behave as you >> would expect from knowing unit files. We may very well want to change >> this in networkd, but need to think a bit about precisely how (the >> whole logic is quite different from unit files, so copying the same >> behavior doesn't quite work I think). > > My question is much simpler: why are empty .network files and files with an > empty [Match] section treated equally? Clearly, empty files still "do > something". > > AFAIU networkd compiles a list of all .network "units" before applying their > settings, so one can check that a file is empty and kick it off the list, no? > > But please note that I haven't looked at the code in detail, so feel free to > ignore me if the above makes no sense.
Yes, this is a possibility. -t _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
