On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > On Wed, 09.04.14 11:21, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> > Several units now utilize the PrivateNetwork parameter, which requires >> > network namespace support. > > BTW, this really sounds like something where we should have graceful > degradation: if network namespaces are missing we should probably simply > ignore PrivateNetwork= (maybe print a one-time warning to syslog, just > to mentioned this), and proceed without them. After all this is a > feature that just takes away features, and doesn't add any, thus simply > ignoring it should be safe. > > I'd be happy to merge a patch which implements such a scheme to support > kernels with a more limited feature set. >
Are there any examples of how to implement a "one-time warning" for this sort of thing? _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
