Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> writes: > On Mon, 21.04.14 19:05, Diogo Vieira (d...@eurotux.com) wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to create a unit to automatically mount a fuse filesystem >> known as S3QL, which is the one in question in this older thread: >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-May/005062.html. The >> problem seems to be that after unmounting the filesystem it still >> needs network access to transfer data. Can someone tell me if it's >> already possible to create a mount unit configuration that covers this >> or should I go with a service unit? And if I need a service unit how >> do I deal with the chance of someone manually unmounting the >> filesystem thus making (I believe, didn't test it) the service status >> return successfully when in fact the filesystem's not mounted? I don't >> know if it's useful, but I'm trying this on Fedora. > > systemd will invoke /bin/mount when mounting a file system, and > /bin/umount when unmountin it. fuse file systems may fork off background > processes from there, that will be kept around while the file system is > mounted, and terminated atfer the file system is unmounted again.
Is there any way to avoid that, and give the background process some time to terminate on its own? Best, -Nikolaus -- GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.« _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel