[Resend to mailing list, because my client somehow swallowed half the Cc fields - sorry about that.]
Hi! I encountered the same issue, running version 195-13.45.1 from opensuse in a container: On 23.04.2014, at 19:26, Andrey Borzenkov (by way of Andrey Borzenkov <[email protected]>) <[email protected]> wrote: > В Wed, 23 Apr 2014 06:43:04 +0200 > Lennart Poettering <[email protected]> пишет: > >> On Sun, 30.03.14 19:23, Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) wrote: >> >>> linux-qbc6:~ # systemctl show systemd-udevd.service -p FragmentPath >>> FragmentPath=/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service >>> linux-qbc6:~ # cp /usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service >>> /etc/systemd/system >>> linux-qbc6:~ # systemctl daemon-reload >>> linux-qbc6:~ # cp /usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service >>> /etc/systemd/system >>> linux-qbc6:~ # systemctl show systemd-udevd.service -p FragmentPath >>> FragmentPath=/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service >>> linux-qbc6:~ # exit >>> >>>> From non-exhaustive testing it appears to be the only unit showing this >>> property. Enabling systemd debug does not add any useful information >>> (no output about unit discovery). Any way to debug it? >>> >>> The version is systemd-208-19.1.x86_64 from openSUSE. >> >> Hmm, that's weird. Is /etc on some weird mount point or so? >> > > Not really. Just plain disk in QEMU VM. > > 17 21 0:5 / /dev rw,relatime shared:2 - devtmpfs devtmpfs > rw,size=380164k,nr_inodes=95041,mode=755 > 18 17 0:15 / /dev/shm rw,relatime shared:3 - tmpfs tmpfs rw > 19 21 0:16 / /run rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime shared:6 - tmpfs tmpfs rw,mode=755 > 20 17 0:11 / /dev/pts rw,relatime shared:4 - devpts devpts > rw,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 > 21 1 8:2 / / rw,relatime shared:1 - ext4 /dev/sda2 rw,data=ordered > ... etc > Similar situation here. >> It might be interesting to run "strace -o log -e open -p 1" and then trigger >> a >> reload, and then look at the generate log file "log". It should show you >> where systemd is looking for the udev service file, and might contain a >> hint, why it skips the file in /etc? >> > > Actually, it does not :) > > 1 open("/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service", > O_RDONLY|O_NOCTTY|O_LARGEFILE|O_NOFOLLOW|O_CLOEXEC) = 17 > 1 open("/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-udevd-kernel.socket", > O_RDONLY|O_NOCTTY|O_LARGEFILE|O_NOFOLLOW|O_CLOEXEC) = 17 > 1 open("/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-udevd-control.socket", > O_RDONLY|O_NOCTTY|O_LARGEFILE|O_NOFOLLOW|O_CLOEXEC) = 17 > 1 open("/etc/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service", > O_RDONLY|O_NOCTTY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC) = 18 > 1 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/etc/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service.d", > O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such > file or directory) > 1 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/run/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service.d", > O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such > file or directory) > 1 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/run/systemd/generator/systemd-udevd.service.d", > O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such > file or directory) > 1 openat(AT_FDCWD, > "/usr/local/lib/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service.d", > O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such > file or directory) > 1 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service.d", > O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such > file or directory) > 1 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/lib/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service.d", > O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such > file or directory) > Systemd does not even try to open the override in /etc here either. However, I noticed an error with /usr/lib/systemd/system/udev.service: <snip> open("/usr/lib/systemd/system/udev.service", O_RDONLY|O_NOCTTY|O_NOFOLLOW|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ELOOP (Too many levels of symbolic links) open("/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service", O_RDONLY|O_NOCTTY|O_NOFOLLOW|O_CLOEXEC) = 15 <snip> Interestingly, removing /usr/lib/systemd/system/udev.service (which is just a symlink to systemd-udevd.service) makes the override work: <snip> open("/etc/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service", O_RDONLY|O_NOCTTY|O_NOFOLLOW|O_CLOEXEC) = 15 <snip> Could it be that this symlink somehow causes systemd to ignore the override? Andrey, do you have similar behavior with /usr/lib/systemd/system/udev.service? Thanks, David _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
