On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Susant Sahani <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/08/2014 12:54 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > > On 04/08/2014 03:22 AM, Susant Sahani wrote: > > file: ipip.netdev > -------------------------- > [NetDev] > Name=ipip-tun > Kind=ipip > > [Tunnel] > Local=192.168.8.102 > Remote=10.4.4.4 > TTL=64 > MTUBytes=1480 > > file: ipip.network > -------------------------- > [Match] > Name=eth0 > > [Network] > Tunnel=ipip-tun > > > I think this is worse from previous example since now you have moved the > network definitions out from the network file and into the net device file. > > > Well thanks for the comment . I am open for the change . Leaving tom to > comment on this .
[sorry for breaking the quoting, hopefully it is clear who said what] I actually think this is the correct way to do it, as the addresses (which I assume is what Jóhann is objecting to?) are properties of the link (similar to mac addresses, mtu, etc) rather than regular ip addresses that you can configure for normal devices. Or maybe I'm missing something? Anyone else have any input on this? If no one else objects I'll merge this (and I'll fix up Zbiginew's comment as I do so, so no need to resend just for that). Cheers, Tom _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
