On 01/06/14 10:04, Tom Gundersen wrote: > > > On 1 Jun 2014 06:31, "Lennart Poettering" <lenn...@poettering.net > <mailto:lenn...@poettering.net>> wrote: > > > > On Sat, 31.05.14 19:43, Samuli Suominen (ssuomi...@gentoo.org > <mailto:ssuomi...@gentoo.org>) wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 31/05/14 17:10, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > > > On 31/05/14 14:14, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > > >> 1. "libsystemd_network_la_SOURCES =" in Makefile.am includes > > > >> "src/libsystemd-network/network-internal.h" > > > >> and there is no anykind of #ifdef -logic behind it > > > >> > > > >> 2. "src/libsystemd-network/network-internal.h" has #include > <libkmod.h> > > > >> and there is no anykind of #ifdef > > > >> -logic behind it > > > >> > > > >> so kmod is hardcoded dependency in systemd-213: > > > >> > > > >> > > > > This patch is a half-complete hack that only works with > > > > --disable-networkd, as it only covers the files > > > > that are outside of the #if NETWORKD in Makefile.am > > > > As in, I've used this patch only for the package within Gentoo that > > > > builds only udev, not rest of systemd, > > > > that uses --disable-networkd > > > > So consider this as proof of consept, not for inclusion > > > > > > > > - Samuli > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > systemd-devel mailing list > > > > systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > <mailto:systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org> > > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel > > > > > > I just realized configure.ac <http://configure.ac> already has, > > > > > > AS_IF([test "x$have_networkd" = "xyes" -a "x$have_kmod" != "xyes"], > > > [AC_MSG_ERROR([networkd requires kmod])]) > > > > > > So this patch should be considered for inclusion after all as-is. You > > > should credit "Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org > <mailto:flop...@gentoo.org>>" for > > > the patch, not me. > > > > I'd prefer I we could fix this properly and allow networkd build without > > kmod. I am very cool on linking against kmod from networkd anyway (in > > particular since I want networkd to run without CAP_SYS_MODULE), so I > > think this could be the least we should be doing... > > We should be able to drop the whole kmod thing from networkd any day > now (a fix is in net-next). Merging it was probably a mistake in the > first place. > >
So, how about applying the patch from this thread to fix the immediate problem? (This reply isn't aimed specifically to you, but to anyone with such deciding/commit powers really.) _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
