On Mon, 23.06.14 11:59, Chase Rayfield (cusbr...@yahoo.com) wrote: > I haven't inquired directly with the GCC mailing list. But it seems > thier current stance is to implement the builtins for architectures > that have the instructions to support them and require the > architectures that do not to supply a library.
Can you point me to some place where they declare that? Is that also their intention for C11 atomic ops? I'd be willing to add a patch to systemd that uses C11 atomic ops if they are available and falls back to gcc atomic ops otherwise. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
