On Mon, 30.06.14 12:41, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote: > > Why would you create such a symlink? This sounds wrong. /tmp should > > generally be a tmpfs these days, why would you link that? > > I need to support cases where /tmp is not tmpfs (e.g. current Fedora > cloud images).
This sounds confused. Why would the cloud images not use a tmpfs for /tmp? > The rationale is the way OSTree implements atomic upgrades and parallel > OS installation involves having separate os roots, so by having /tmp -> > /sysroot/tmp they're shared rather than separate per root. Not following here. You should really declare that /tmp has to be a tmpfs. Anyway, to allow to avoid the discussion I have now added ConditionPathIsSymbolicLink=!/tmp to tmp.mount. This will skip mounting of the tmpfs if /tmp is already a symlink. This should fix your issue? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
