On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 08:23:15PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > On 07/08/2014 07:31 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > >]] Tom Gundersen > > > >>Patches look good. Only found one tiny nit. We should come up with a > >>better name though, feels wrong that the name is very generic (and > >>clashes with other uses), whilst the usage is quite specific (limited > >>to "testing", "staging", "production"). > >Surely at least qa and dev should go onto that list. (You generally > >want more than one dev environment too, often one or more per > >developer.) > > > > These days people usually use only 3 tier level ( used to be four back in > the day ) as in Development and Integration is done the same tier while > Staging and Production are separated tiers altogether. We could extend that > and include the fourth tier missing tier ( as in Integration ) as "optional" > for those that prefer 4 tier layer over 3 tier but people moved away form > that model to the 3 tier one. > > Development tier > > Integration tier > > Staging tier > > Production >
We also have Disaster Recovery (DR) tier. It's basically copy of production, started when disaster strucks. -- Tomasz Torcz RIP is irrevelant. Spoofing is futile. xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl Your routes will be aggreggated. -- Alex Yuriev _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
