I don't mean to be pedantic, but I think "any" would be a better choice.
-Alex On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Tom Gundersen <t...@jklm.no> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Colin Guthrie <gm...@colin.guthr.ie> > wrote: > > 'Twas brillig, and Tom Gundersen at 06/07/14 23:32 did gyre and gimble: > >>> > That worked... thanks. BTW, is yes/true still a valid argument for > DHCP > >>> > (because the manpage says otherwise)? > >> "yes" is a synonym for "both" and "no" for "none". > > > > While I know it's not something we need to worry about for a long, long > > time, should we avoid using the term "both" generally? Perhaps "all" is > > better? I mean I'm not expecting IPv8 any time soon, but then people > > thought two digits was enough space to represent the date too :p > > Hm, to me "all" sounds strange when we currently only have two... > Anyawy, I'd be happy to add an "all" option as well (and keep "both" > as backwards compatibility) once we get IPv8 ;) > > -t > _______________________________________________ > systemd-devel mailing list > systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel >
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
