On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:57:41PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Jon Severinsson <j...@severinsson.net> > wrote: > > From: Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> > > > > This change was part of the old debianisation branch created by Tollef > > and reflects the fact that on Debian the $remote_fs system facility > > depends on $local_fs. > > If this is merely for sysv compat, it feels wrong to add this in the > native unit files (but maybe the argument could be made regardless?). > If it is just for bacwards compatibility, I would rather put it in the > sysvgenerator itself (to add a drop-in if something pulls in > $remote_fs). > > Not sure if this should be upstream or downstream though, depends if > this makes sense outside of Debian. No, tying those targets doesn't make much sense. It does not provide anything for the services which are part of remote-fs.target, they have to carry their own dependencies on local-fs.target if necessary. So the only thing it does is that it'll delay remote-fs.target if it were to be reached before local-fs.target.
Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
