On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Simon McVittie <simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk> wrote: > On 31/07/14 21:38, Kay Sievers wrote: >> We have one .busname file per name and it will get really complicated >> to start stop a busname, when it has multiple names per connection. We >> should really avoid that and require one connection per name and allow >> only name. > > I might be misunderstanding what you're getting at here (unfortunately I > still haven't had time to review the kdbus design or codebase in detail) > but are you saying that under kdbus, each connection to the bus (thing > with a unique name like :1.42, analogous to DBusConnection) is only > allowed to own one well-known name (thing like org.freedesktop.systemd1)?
No, it is not about connections that exchange messages, but about policy holders which cannot communicate themselves. Ordinary connections can own many well-known names. Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
