On Wed, 30.07.14 09:02, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com) wrote:
> --- > units/ldconfig.service | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/units/ldconfig.service b/units/ldconfig.service > index 43c145b..09a2b74 100644 > --- a/units/ldconfig.service > +++ b/units/ldconfig.service > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ Conflicts=shutdown.target > After=systemd-readahead-collect.service systemd-readahead-replay.service > systemd-remount-fs.service > Before=sysinit.target shutdown.target systemd-update-done.service > ConditionNeedsUpdate=/etc > +ConditionFileIsExecutable=/sbin/ldconfig > > [Service] > Type=oneshot Ummmmmhh... Do we really want this? I presume you are not using glibc, are you? I mean, whether ldconfig is around or not is not really an admin decision, it's an OS vendor decision. Because of that we should probably make shiping the ldconfig service file optional, rather then always ship it but then conditionalize it... I'd prefer to keep conditions rather minimal in general... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
