On Sun, 27.07.14 20:04, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote: > but that still don't explain why "ExecStopPost=/sur/bin/true" or > whatever "ExecStopPost" solves that and if it is not supported > why "systemctl" don't return after the one and only process > exited
Well, this is a misunderstanding how ExecStop= and friends are supposed to work. They are supposed to do what they did on sysvinit: synchronously terminate a service. And not asynchronously do that. We hence don't wait for anything else then, because what is left afterwards must be left-over processes that ExecStop= and friends couldn't clean up properly... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
