On Fri, 15.08.14 10:22, Harald Hoyer (harald.ho...@gmail.com) wrote: > On 14.08.2014 19:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 06:44:03PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> 2014-08-14 18:36 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl>: > >>> It would be more useful to remove the "/ 1min 30s" part. Maybe the cylon > >>> code could be smart enough for that. > >> > >> I think it's useful information to know that the timeout is 90s. > >> An alternative could be, to simply use seconds and not convert that > >> into h:m:s values. > >> A "77s / 90s" display would be ok to me. > > > > What I meant is to skip the limit only where there is a shortage of space. > > But thinking about it again, it is hard to say which is more important. So > > maybe it is better to instead display the time remaining, like -33s, -32s, > > -31s... > > when columns() <= 80. > > ^this :)
Instead of making this context sensitive, for simplicity reasons: why not just always show the negative time? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
