On Fri, 15.08.14 08:41, Michael Olbrich ([email protected]) wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 03:04:20PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > I applied a different patch now that makes sure we either get the full > > IPv6 support or none at all, and doesn't generate a warning. > > > > Please have a look, if this fixes things for you. > > This work now. However I had to revert > 5ba73e9b646af4d8109a5a633aa235665858144d (resolved: clarify that LLMNR > scopes must have a link assigned). dns_scope_llmnr_membership() is called > twice with s->protocol = DNS_PROTOCOL_DNS. dns_scope_new() calls it with > the specified link and protocol here: > > $ git grep dns_scope_new | grep AF_UNSPEC > src/resolve/resolved-link.c: r = > dns_scope_new(l->manager, &l->unicast_scope, l, DNS_PROTOCOL_DNS, AF_UNSPEC); > src/resolve/resolved-manager.c: r = dns_scope_new(m, > &m->unicast_scope, NULL, DNS_PROTOCOL_DNS, AF_UNSPEC);
Fixed now in git! Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
