On Mon, 18.08.14 15:06, WaLyong Cho (walyong....@samsung.com) wrote: > And add prefix "selinux_" to each APIs like smack.
I am a bit concerned about this, as "selinux_" is really the prefix the selinux libraries use for most of their newer symbols. And they have a lot of symbols that actually are named very similar to ours (given that ours are just wrappers for them anyway to just make their apis more digestable...). libselinux is quite chaotic, they also use the "selabel_" prefix sometimes, and sometimes no prefix it all. Other times they use the "security_" prefix. Seems they really didn't understand the concept of namespacing in C... Anyway, maybe we can find a different prefix to use. "selnx_" or so? Not pretty, but at least distinct? "sel_"? "se_linux_"? "util_selinux"? or maybe we just call call our internal selinux apis "label_selinux_xyz", and our smack apis "label_smack_xyz"? Or maybe "mac_selinux_xyz" and "mac_smack_xyz"? I think the latter sounds most appropriate to me right now, as it is still somewhat short, and sufficiently distinctive. I'd probably go for that. Any other suggestions? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
