On Fri, 15.08.14 21:10, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > > 2014-08-15 12:50 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net>: > > I think most of the confusion here comes from the fact that sysv service > > restarts don't care about ordering at all, really, and we do. But the > > answer to that is not to weaken the current strong semantics of > > blocking, but simply not to request blocking operation at all, i.e. use > > --no-block, and just queue things in, instead of waiting for them. > > > > Note that on FEdora the sysv /sbin/service glue actually adds in > > --no-block for many cases, too, due to the stricter requirements of > > systemd there. > > I just had a look at /sbin/service and/etc/init.d/functions as > shipped by F20 and couldn't find any traces of --no-block. > > I'd be interested to know under what conditions you add --no-block.
Ah, sorry, it doesn't use --no-block. But it does use the ignore-dependencies stuff, look for SYSTEMCTL_IGNORE_DEPENDENCIES in /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
