On Thursday 21 August 2014 at 19:32:01, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 21/08/14 19:12, Ivan Shapovalov wrote: > > Actually, I don't pretty understand the reasoning behind skipping the > > default > > dependencies on /usr mount > > (Some of) the default dependencies require that /usr is mounted, so > mounting /usr cannot depend on them, to avoid a cycle. > > (Or to put it the way round: normal, non-early-boot services should be > able to assume that /usr is mounted so that they can rely on files in > /usr/lib or /usr/share without explicitly declaring extra dependencies, > which again means /usr can't depend on the default dependencies.)
Understood, thanks. (For the original discussion: so is it better to explicitly "Before=usr.mount"?) -- Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel