On Tue, 26.08.14 04:45, Ivan Shapovalov (intelfx...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Tuesday 26 August 2014 at 02:59:25, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > This is absolutely not fatal, and arguably not an error condition at all. > > > > > > If a machine is simply rebooted, without hibernation image in place (but > > > with > > > resume= kernel parameter), this code path will be hit. > > > > But then it should just be log_info(), not log_notice()? > > syslog(3) says "normal, but significant, condition". I guess that this fits > here, > but if you think log_info() is more appropriate, then let it be so.
I'd vote for log_info(), but I figure it odesn't matter really, you choice... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
