On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Emil Renner Berthing <syst...@esmil.dk> wrote: > On 18 September 2014 15:56, Karol Lewandowski <k.lewando...@samsung.com> > wrote:> >> I think it would be way better (and easy) to reimplement original >> secure_getenv() rather than falling back to function with different >> semantics. secure_ is there for a reason. > > Agreed. Added to my TODO, thanks.
Yeah, please do this in the libc. We cannot fall back to broken/insecure behaviour. Cheers, Tom _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
