On 09/19/2014 02:00 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Susant Sahani <sus...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 09/19/2014 01:35 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
I don't think that's right. Ignoring the return value of that fcntl is
just fine. We read the buffer-size afterwards, so if it failed, we
still continue properly. See fcntl(2) for a bunch of errors that might
Well I think set and get are two operations. for example let's say set
failed but get success.
setting BUFFER_SIZE failed and in this case buf size is remained as default
pipe size.
..exactly! And the default buffer size is just fine. We'd prefer if we
could set it to BUFFER_SIZE, but if we're not allowed to do that, we
still continue running with the already set buffer size.
yes but how about giving a log for coverity and we ignore the error ?
Thanks
David
Susant
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
