On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > El jue, 25-09-2014 a las 16:44 +0200, Tom Gundersen escribió: >> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Lennart Poettering >> <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: >> > So, I think with the release after the upcoming one we should just >> > remove it from the systemd package and just throw it on the pile of >> > historic cruft. So, yeah, here's the advance warning that this will be >> > happening... >> > >> > (Well, unless somebody from the community who cares and wants to invest >> > the necessary time in it steps up and gives it the love it really >> > needs. If nobody does until that release, I will delete the component >> > from systemd). >> >> No one objected to this, so I pushed the patch deleting it. If anyone >> wants to resurrect this in an external repo, it should be simple >> enough to extract it from git. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Tom >> _______________________________________________ >> systemd-devel mailing list >> systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel > > Is there any other readahead implementation around that we could migrate > to? Well, not sure many laptops with SSD are sold in your area but, at > least in mine, most people still have (and buy) setups with rotational > hard drives that have a clear gain when running readahead (well, I can > see it every time I reboot and login on gnome-shell if I don't use > readahead)
I think the best bet would be someone who understands/knows/uses this stuff to resurrect systemd-readahead in a third-party repo and maintain it there. AFAIK, it was the best of the available options. Cheers, Tom _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
