On 11/10/2014 10:26 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 07.11.14 10:03, Casey Schaufler (ca...@schaufler-ca.com) wrote: > >> Calling it SmackLabel= instead of SmackLabelExec= would be fine as >> far as I'm concerned. SmackLabel= is more consistent with SELinuxContext= >> and AppArmorProfile=, as you point out. > > OK! > > WaLyong, let's name it SmackLabel= then!
I think I had made you to bother. Excuse me, but I'm asking you again. And I think introducing new config should be careful. Hmm, I'm still confusing. We're already using SmackLabel= as socket config item. Yeah, it can possible as both exec/socket config. But each purposes are different. In socket config, this config is used to set SMACK64 of socket file. In exec config, this config is used to set child systemd attribute when User= config is given. And does we have to explain each man page? Or drop from socket package and move that to exec page? I'm not sure it make sense. Thanks WaLyong > > Lennart > _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
