On Mon, 10.11.14 22:30, Thomas Meyer (tho...@m3y3r.de) wrote: > Am Freitag, den 07.11.2014, 01:59 +0100 schrieb Lennart Poettering: > > On Sun, 02.11.14 12:48, Thomas Meyer (tho...@m3y3r.de) wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I tried to switch to the emergency target and back to the graphical > > > target, > > > but this doesn't seem to work. > > > > > > Should this work, i.e.? > > > > > > # systemctl isolate emergency.target > > > # systemctl isolate graphical.target > > > > > > The services seems to fail with this error once I'm in the > > > emergency.target > > > and try to switch back to the graphical.target: > > > status=219/CGROUP > > > Mhh, strange. the last two tries to reproduces this bug failed. > everything worked as expected. Strange! > > anyway I'm going to upgrade to Fedora 21 in the next days. so I'll watch > out for this bug again, then.
This really feels like a race. Something is removing the cgroup before we can add the process to the cgroup. One way to track this down might be to use Martin Pitt's "fatrace" tool to check which process is removing the cgroup ultimately. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
