Hi
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Ronny Chevalier
<chevalier.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> CID#979416
> ---
> src/udev/collect/collect.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/udev/collect/collect.c b/src/udev/collect/collect.c
> index dc849bd..6cb10fe 100644
> --- a/src/udev/collect/collect.c
> +++ b/src/udev/collect/collect.c
> @@ -86,12 +86,13 @@ static void usage(void)
> */
> static int prepare(char *dir, char *filename)
> {
> - struct stat statbuf;
> char buf[512];
> int fd;
> + int r;
>
> - if (stat(dir, &statbuf) < 0)
> - mkdir(dir, 0700);
> + r = mkdir(dir, 0700);
> + if (r < 0 && errno != EEXIST)
> + return -errno;
>
> snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s/%s", dir, filename);
So the race you describe is if the directory is removed after we
stat() it, but before we use it somewhere down in the code. Applying
your patch avoids the stat(), but it still fails if the dir is removed
after your mkdir(). So this doesn't fix anything, does it?
The code is definitely nicer than before, so I guess I'll apply it,
anyway. But I don't see how it would fix anything, but silence a
coverity warning. Or am I missing something? Feel free to prove me
wrong ;)
Thanks
David
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
