Am 20.11.2014 um 19:22 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 11/20/2014 06:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:Am 20.11.2014 um 19:10 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:On 11/20/2014 04:24 PM, Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:Hi,rhel7 / centos7 is shipped with heavily patched systemd 208, which does not contain new interesting features and for us it is a backporting nightmare. I have prepared an experimental repo with newer version of systemd for epel7. Currently it is based on 217 from Fedora rawhide and final goal should be 218. If you are interested, here is a COPR build. Feedback and bug reports are as always highly appreciated. https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lnykryn/systemd/ LukasWont you break your RHEL support if you run this?given that the OP has a @redhat.com address i guess the intention is to test and prepare a official RHEL update over the time reading "and for us it is a backporting nightmare" makes that more than a guessThat's a given and not what I asked.
but that's very likely truewhat you asked don't matter since this is a *developer list* and so no place where a RHEL customer with support is expected to jump blindly and try unsupported packages
Red Hat should be supplying it's own QA resources to test it's own and upcoming RHEL product releases instead of be reaching out to the community *to do it for them* and leach of it + he does not mention, if you intend on testing this on RHEL if it breaks your RHEL support contract or not ( which most likely it does ) hence the question
no idea from where your personal vendetta against Redhat is coming (not only in that response, over years, everywhere) but why don't you just ignore anything containing the company name?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
