Hi
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:12:20PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Stanisław Pitucha <virap...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > TXT records should have at least one character, so enforce this.
>> > Previously parser SIGSEGV'd on ->txt.strings being NULL.
>>
>> Your patch fixes the issue, indeed. However, I didn't have the time to
>> look this up in the DNS RFC. I'm not really sure TXT records cannot be
>> empty (and I'm not sure any follow-up RFC allows empty records).
>> Therefore, I fixed resolved to work with empty txt.strings strvs
>> instead. See:
> I think we should follow the RFCs here and reject invalid TXT strings.
> RFC1035 says "TXT-DATA One or more <character-string>s."
> So {""} is fine (strv size one, with an empty string), but not {}.
Thanks for the verification!
Did you check that the same is true for SPF? The code handles TXT and
SPF the same way.
Thanks
David
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
