On Fri, 05.12.14 00:20, Ivan Shapovalov (intelfx...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi all, > > The systemd.mount(5) man page mentions an inexistent mount option "fail" in > the > following context: > > nofail, fail > With nofail this mount will be only wanted, not required, by the > local-fs.target. This means that the boot will continue even if this > mount point is not mounted successfully. Option fail has the opposite > meaning and is the default. > > Specifying the option "fail" in fstab produces following message in the log: > > kernel: EXT4-fs (sdc1): Unrecognized mount option "fail" or missing value > > So the man page contradicts actual behavior. Should this statement be removed, > or what?
Indeed, neither util-linux nor actually our own code cares about the "fail" option, and it is the default anyway. I removed this now from the man page. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
