Hi Johann, Also, note that VlanId is optional. It makes more sense for switch ports. Regarding my “em1” (Ethernet management) interface, probably I should have send an example without VLANId. And “BridgeFDB”s are in the .network following the logic of routes.
To be clear look at the outputs below: 1. for a normal port: >bridge fdb show dev em1 44:44:12:34:56:70 self permanent 44:44:12:34:56:71 self permanent 33:33:00:00:00:01 self permanent 01:00:5e:00:00:01 self permanent 33:33:ff:8f:e7:3f self permanent 01:00:5e:00:00:fc self permanent 33:33:00:01:00:03 self permanent 2. for a switch port: >bridge fdb show dev sw0p1 14:44:12:34:56:70 vlan 2 self permanent 14:44:12:34:56:71 vlan 10 self permanent /Alin From: systemd-devel [mailto:systemd-devel-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:51 AM To: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v3] Add FDB support On 12/17/2014 05:46 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 12/17/2014 03:35 PM, Alin Rauta wrote: Hi Tom, I've formatted the patch based on our previous discussions. This one has support only for adding FDB entries. An example configuration is like below: [Match] Name=em1 [Network] DHCP=v4 [BridgeFDB] MACAddress=44:44:12:34:56:71 VLANId=9 [BridgeFDB] MACAddress=44:44:12:34:56:70 VLANId=2 br0 Please let me know what you think. Thanks, Alin If I start trying to match this with the entire type network files and their path ( feel free to correct me where I'm wrong here ) It would have to look like this... Ignore my mac address entry confusion with the bridge mac addresses in the MAC learning table and the interface mac address here ( em1 ) which somewhat would have been eliminated if we had [BridgePort] and arguably [BridgePortFDB] sections in the network file JBG JBG
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel