On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 07:09:34PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > On 12/18/2014 06:44 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > > >On 12/18/2014 06:36 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >>You missed the part where I said "you should make it opt-in". > > > >Should we not first determine the practicality of implementing > >this and if the system service manager should actually be looking > >up this info to begin with? > > > >We could not add the ability to define the upstream homepage in > >the status output but we can now clutter the status output with a > >name of a package? > > This could be implemented without the overhead and conflict as an > extension to the output listed with "systemctl list-unit-files" if > opt-in That's a valid point. list-unit-files seems to be a better home for this.
Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel