On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 09:04:35PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > В Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:34:07 +0000 > Colin Guthrie <co...@mageia.org> пишет: > > > > > Anyway, assuming the process is in the .mount unit cgroup, should > > systemd detect the umount and kill the processes accordingly, and if > > It does not do it currently. It only starts killing if (u)mount times > out. Otherwise if umount is successful it goes to stopped state > immediately. Although it probably should, even for the sake of user > space helpers. > > > not, should calling "systemctl status" on .mount units show processes > > even if it's in an inactive state? > > > > I believe something very similar (not only for mount units) was > reported recently, but I do not have reference handy. I mean, processes > belonging to stopped unit (e.g. with KillMode=none) are not displayed. >
This commit is probably needed: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=dab5bf859900c0abdbf78c584e4aed42a19768cd Regards -- Ross Lagerwall _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
