On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:42:28PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> ... which leads me to the question: why don't we just call the actual
> "eject" program? Just to avoid that dependency?
BTW, eject is maintained in util-linxu now, and it's based on
libmount and sysfs stuff we have in util-linux (and systemd already
depends on util-linux).
Karel
--
Karel Zak <[email protected]>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
