Hello, consider two vt sessions vt1, vt2. On vt1 handle-lid-switch is inhibited. Now the lid is closed and than a vt switch takes place (e.g. "sleep 10 && loginctl activate vt2"). Now the system suspends. I guess this is because the new active session has no inhibitor lock on handle-lid-switch and therefor retroactively reacts to the closed lid.
Is this intentional or could it be changed? Background: There are screen locker, which use the display managers login screen for unlocking the session; e.g. light-locker + lightdm. Locking a session involves a vt switch to display the authentication screen. If such a locker gets started while the lid is closed, the system suspends, even if the original session inhibited the handle-lid-switch. Thanks _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
