On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 05:33:06PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Lennart Poettering [2015-01-27 17:22 +0100]: > > The .mount units of device nodes already have a BindsTo= dependency on > > their respective backing .device units. This should have the effect > > that systemd will take the .mount units down if the .device units are > > removed. Are you saying that doesn't work? > > It's been ages since I've had a CD drive with an eject button, so I > can't say myself. But given the recent reports on the list from Robert > Milasan and Dave Reiser it seems that *something* here is still > broken?
Well, my test case was flawed and the mount namespacing in udevd isn't actually relevant to the problem. I've since found myself uninterested in solving this particular problem. dR _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
