On 27 January 2015 at 21:35, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:30:48PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> On Tue, 27.01.15 15:45, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) >> wrote: >> >> > Yes, I think attempting any kind of dependency removal *from loaded >> > units* would be very complicated, and would require major surgery to >> > current unit engine. And things would become conceptually more complicated, >> > which we certainly don't need. >> > >> > But masking of .wants/ links is something different I think. It is a >> > *localized* modification to a single configuration file. We currently >> > allow overridding of almost all configuration (units files, files in >> > .d directories, recently even generators), but .wants and .requires >> > are an exception. I think we should allow this. Apart from current >> > use case, it would things more consistent for the user. >> >> Hmm, I am open to allowing to override the symlinks with symlinks, if >> you follow what I mean. But i'd be careful with allowing to override >> stuff listed in Wants= in a unit file in /usr, with a symlink in a >> .wants/ dir in /etc, if you follow what I mean. > Yes, exactly. > >> But yeah, allowing symlinks to override symlinks makes sense, a patch >> for that would be good. >> >> Lennart > > Zbyszek >
ack. -- Regards, Dimitri. Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
