On Wed, 28.01.15 10:13, Rauta, Alin (alin.ra...@intel.com) wrote: > Lennart, on a switch I should be able to configure more than one UFD > group.
What precisely does this mean? WOuld those groups be orthogonal? I really would like to avoid introdcuing the "tags" concept for now. Would a solution where you give the uplinks appropriate names (like "uplink0", "uplinkXYZ", "uplink_waldo" and so on) suffice, when you can then refer to them in a .network file you apply to the downlinks as "BindCarrier=uplink*"? BindCarrier= would take a list of interface names, possibly with globs. If you want to up and down a link "foo" if at least one of the links "bar", "quux", "piep", "miau1", "miau2" are up, you could write this as "BindCarrier=bar quux piep miau*". What would introducing the "tag" concept give you beyond this very simple schreme described above? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
