On Fri, 09.01.15 10:26, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: > Colin Guthrie wrote on 08/01/15 11:55: > > I "solved" this by adding a user unit for gnome-termnial-server and > > making dbus use systemd activation for it, but that just moves it to a > > different cgroup. I guess it's OK like this. > > Just as a minor curiosity related to this bit... > > I discovered today that handing this particular process over to as > systemd --user unit is a bit broken! > > It seems that gnome-terminal-server will exit when the last > gnome-terminal dies. If you have started any programs in the background > in the terminal (xeyes&, or even screen) and then close all your > gnome-terminal processes, the main process of the cgroup becomes empty > and then all the child processes are (correctly) reaped by systemd --user > > Fun! > > The screen example is a tough one here tho' with gnome-terminal-server. > Since I removed it's own systemd unit, it will now live in the dbus > daemon's cgroup and depending when the daemon dies, it not survive a > logout... will have to check that! Might be OK tho'. > > Playing with systemd --user is fun :)
Ideally gnome-terminal would open a user scope unit for each of its tabs. This would allow them to survive, even without patching KillMode= for the g-t-s service... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
