Hi Lennart, I agree that "BindCarrier=" should suffice.
Best Regards, Alin -----Original Message----- From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 10:50 AM To: Rauta, Alin Cc: Andrei Borzenkov; Tom Gundersen; Kinsella, Ray; systemd Mailing List Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Added UFD (Uplink failure detection) support to networkd On Tue, 03.02.15 09:05, Rauta, Alin (alin.ra...@intel.com) wrote: > Yes, since the concept of UFD group is not exposed. Does this mean we have agreement that the simply BindCarrier= option I proposed would be sufficient for your usecases? That would be great! Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
