On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 06:49:21AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 02:42:36AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:30:43AM +0100, Jan Synacek wrote: > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-December/026190.html > > > > > > I haven't got time to properly analyze the problem since then... > > It sounded familiar ;) > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:36:29PM +0200, Patrik Flykt wrote: > > > "Operation not permitted" is what is printed for EPERM. But EPERM is not > > > present in the client code itself, so I'm inclined towards a "permission > > > problem" somewhere when running mock. > > EPERM is also returned when using /dev/null in epoll_ctl_add. > > I think I fixed it now. > > > > Which leads to a failure on arm in test-network: > > FAIL: test-network > > ================== > > Assertion '!address_equal(a1, a2)' failed at > > ../src/network/test-network.c:161, function test_address_equality(). > > Aborting. > > > > I got out my chromebook to see what going on here. > Ha, undefined behaviour on right shift. Gotta love C ;) > > So the tests pass in mock on all three primary arches. > > I'll let it spin on arm64 just to see what comes up. And that passes too.
Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
