True, but it's better than nothing. Well, I guess systemd-networkd doing basic things will have to wait on kdbus :-)
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > 1;3802;0cOn Tue, 03.02.15 14:38, Charles Devereaux (syst...@guylhem.net) > wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Lennart Poettering < > lenn...@poettering.net> > > wrote: > > > > > I am pretty sure signals are not a particularly good interface for > > > this. We should add a proper bus API for this one day, but this kinda > > > has to wait until kdbus is a done deal, since networkd runs in early > > > boot, and dbus-daemon is not available in early boot. > > > > Which would be a good usecase for signals (until kdbus happens, which > might > > take some time) > > Signals are asynchronous, which makes them a lot less useful to use, > since you cannot wait resonably for completion the operation you request. > > Lennart > > -- > Lennart Poettering, Red Hat >
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
